Kimmeridge Clay (Shale) Formation

In the Weald Basin, the main interest of the hydrocarbon companies is the Kimmeridge Clay Formation (KCF), a thick deposit of shale rock which extends across most of the region. A close analogue is the Bakken Formation of North Dakota. Oil was first discovered within the Bakken in early 1950s, but the area is most known for its recent oil boom enabled by hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling technologies. Since the early 2000s, the state has undergone massive industrialisation as thousands of wells have been drilled and fracked.

At Brockham, the KCF is around 400m thick, with its upper and lower boundaries at around 750 and 1150 meters below ground. The KCF at Brockham contains three bands of micrite (9 to 25 meters thick), which could more accurately be described as a coccolith bearing shale rock deposit. The industry likes to call them limestones, but this is scientifically unsound and misleading.

Kimm InterevalTable showing the Kimmeridge layers, depth and thickness in feet and meters (based on Nutech study of Brockham #1, Sept 2016).

The permeability of the Kimmeridge micrites is between 0.02 and 0.032 milliDarcy (and that of the shale layers is even lower) – well below the generally accepted boundary of 0.1 mD between conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon extraction. Below 0.1 mD is generally considered to require unconventional extraction methods such as hydraulic fracturing or acid stimulation.

The Kimmeridge reservoir (and the source rock at the same time) is distributed throughout a widespread layer with no clear-cut boundaries. On the other hand, conventional reservoirs are found in finite and well-defined traps, with the source rock below, and cap rock above.

Schematc geology of gas resources, from US Energy Informaton Administraton.

David Smythe – Emeritus Professor of Geophysics in the University of Glasgow – has studied in-depth developments targeting the Kimmeridge at Horse Hill, Broadford Bridge, Leith Hill and Brockham.  In his expert opinion for Brockham, he concludes that Angus Energy’s arguments that stimulation of the KCF –  whether by acidisaton or by fracking – will not be necessary are incredible, because they run counter to the known geomechanical properties of the KCF, and because they conflict with the extensive experience of similar unconventional plays in the USA.